Chemicals
Why is the chemical sector important?
The chemical sector is the largest industrial energy consumer and the third largest industry subsector in terms of direct CO2 emissions. This is largely because around half of the chemical subsector’s energy input is consumed as feedstock – fuel used as a raw material input rather than as a source of energy. There is growing demand for a vast array of chemical products, including plastics, and demand for primary chemicals – an indication of activity in the sector overall – has increased strongly.
What is the role of the chemicals sector in clean energy transitions?
Material efficiency measures – including increased plastics recycling, using ammonia fertilisers more efficiently, and reducing the use of single-use plastics – are important to reduce chemicals demand. Recycling offsets the need for primary production, but globally only about 10% of plastic is recycled. While the share is increasing, progress needs to accelerate.
Where do we need to go?
Chemical sector emissions need to peak in the next few years and decline towards 2030 to get on track with the Net Zero Scenario, despite strong growth in demand for its outputs. To get on track, government and industry efforts need to address CO2 emissions from chemical production, as well those generated during the use and disposal of chemical products.
Tracking Chemicals
Direct CO2 emissions from primary chemical production remained relatively constant at around 935 Mt in 2022, as a result of a stagnation in production. This is in tandem with a relatively stable primary chemicals CO2 intensity over recent years, at around 1.3 t CO2 per tonne of primary chemicals1.
In the Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) Scenario, CO2 emissions start to decouple from production in the coming few years, reaching a 18% CO2 emission reduction compared to 2022 by 2030 despite an increase in production. To get on track with the NZE Scenario, both the private and public sectors will need to achieve technological innovation, efficiency gains and higher recycling rates.
1 Primary chemicals include ethylene, propylene, benzene, toluene, mixed xylenes, ammonia and methanol.
Important steps to deploy low-emissions chemicals production technologies are being taken in several regions
Important steps to deploy low-emissions chemicals production technologies are being taken in several regions
Countries and regions making notable progress in decarbonising the chemicals sector include:
- The European Union accounts for the largest number of electrolysis projects for ammonia and methanol production, in addition to having the highest plastic recycling rates in the world.
- Trinidad and Tobago, though small in size and population, has great potential to reduce carbon emission, and has started to take action. The low-emission hydrogen project NewGen, which will provide low-emission hydrogen for the production of ammonia, is expected to be launch next year. This project could have a significant impact, as Trinidad and Tobago ranks among the top ten ammonia and methanol producers, and among the top three exporters.
CO2 emissions must decouple from production by 2030 to get on track with the NZE Scenario
CO2 emissions must decouple from production by 2030 to get on track with the NZE Scenario
Direct CO2 emissions from primary chemical production in the Net Zero Scenario, 2010-2030
OpenThe chemical sector is the largest industrial energy consumer but only the third largest industry subsector in terms of direct CO2 emissions. This is because around half of the chemical sector’s energy input is consumed as feedstock – fuel used as a raw material input rather than as a source of energy. Ammonia production is responsible for the highest share of emissions accounting for 45% of emissions from primary chemical production, followed by methanol (28%) and high-value chemicals2 (27%).
The chemical sector’s emissions must peak in the next few years and decline by about 15% relative to current levels by 2030 to get on track with the NZE Scenario, despite growth in demand for the sector’s outputs. To achieve this goal, government and industry efforts must address CO2 emissions from chemical production, as well as those generated during the use and disposal of chemical products.
2 High value chemicals: ethylene, propylene, benzene, toluene and mixed xylenes.
Energy consumption for feedstock will continue to rise with production, but process energy intensity declines rapidly in the NZE Scenario
Energy consumption for feedstock will continue to rise with production, but process energy intensity declines rapidly in the NZE Scenario
Process energy for primary chemical production, 2010-2030
OpenOil and gas are currently the main feedstocks used in the chemical sector, as they serve as sources of hydrogen and carbon, which are used as raw material to produce basic chemicals such as ethylene, propylene and ammonia. Their use is set to grow in line with material demand. Energy is also used to fuel production processes, which is distinguished from feedstock as ‘process energy’.
The coal-based chemical industry, particularly prevalent in China, poses a significant environmental challenge, as emission intensities are considerably higher than in natural gas-based production. Methanol can be produced from coal at a low cost in China, which has facilitated the large-scale production of plastics from coal. Coal accounted for an estimated 36% of process energy used in primary chemical production in 2022, but its use must decline by about 30% by 2030 to get on track with NZE Scenario milestones. In this scenario, oil use, which already accounts for a very small share of process energy for primary chemical production, further declines by 2030. Increasing electricity and bioenergy use make up most of the difference from declining coal and oil use.
Increased energy efficiency – achieved both through incremental improvements to existing methods and step-changes resulting from switching to fundamentally more efficient methods (e.g. from coal- to natural gas-based processing) – is also important in the NZE Scenario.
Primary chemical production is set to keep growing in the NZE Scenario
Primary chemical production is set to keep growing in the NZE Scenario
Growth in primary chemical production in the Net Zero Scenario, 2000-2030
OpenThe sector’s substantial energy consumption is driven by demand for a vast array of chemical products. Demand for primary chemicals – which is an indication of activity in the sector overall – has increased strongly in recent decades. After strong growth in 2021, as activity rebounded following the Covid-19 pandemic, production stagnated in 2022, in part due to the global energy crisis.
Underlying this global trend are different dynamics between primary chemicals:
- Ammonia: forming the basis of all synthetic nitrogen fertilisers, ammonia has seen relatively modest growth over the past decade (1% annually), with 2022 experiencing even slower growth, mostly due to a production decrease in Europe in response to high natural gas prices. China is the largest producer today (30% of global production).
- High-value chemicals: being key precursors to most plastics, high-value chemical demand has grown 3.0% annually over the past decade, but in 2022 it remained stagnant due to declining production, predominantly in the European Union, Japan, Korea, Russia and Chinese Taipei. China, the United States and the Middle East are the largest producers today, together accounting for 57% of global production.
- Methanol: the main end uses are for formaldehyde, fuel applications and intermediaries to produce high-value chemicals, replacing oil as feedstock. Demand has grown very quickly in the last decade (6.5% annually) and by around 2.4% in 2022. China, the world’s largest methanol producer, accounts for 58% of production.
Material efficiency measures – including increasing plastics recycling, using nutrients more efficiently (in the case of ammonia fertiliser), and reducing the use of single-use plastics – are important in the NZE Scenario to reduce the growth in demand relative to baseline trends. Recycling, in particular, is needed to reduce the need for virgin polymers. Recycling rates vary widely, but globally recycled plastics only account for about 8% of total plastic production. While this share is increasing, progress needs to accelerate.
Efforts to develop low-emission methods of chemical production and recycling continue, but must accelerate
Efforts to develop low-emission methods of chemical production and recycling continue, but must accelerate
The main decarbonisation pathways for the chemical sector are carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) and the use of electrolytic hydrogen. In addition, given that about 30% of required process heat is below 200 °C, direct electrification technologies such as high-temperature heat pumps can create efficiencies. Recent innovations related to chemical production include:
- Methanol: In October 2022 the first commercial-scale emission-to-liquids plant, the Shunli CO2-to-methanol plant, was commissioned in China. This plant is currently the largest of its kind in the world, with a production capacity of 110 kt.
- Ammonia: The world’s first industrial dynamic green power-to-ammonia demonstration plant is under construction in Denmark and due to launch in early 2024. The project is being developed in partnership between Skovgaard Energy, Topsoe, Vestas and ABB. “Dynamic” here means that ammonia production can react to any change in hydrogen production from the variable renewable energy-powered electrolysers – it will only operate when there is sufficient renewable energy, without the help of storage.
- High-value chemicals and plastics: innovation is also continuing on low-emission alternative materials to produce so-called “bioplastics”. The Italian company Aquafil and its “Effective” project is just one of the multiple examples in this field. Nonetheless, concerns about poor biodegradation and the availability and management of bio-resources have slowed the uptake of these technologies.
- High temperature heat pumps: Due to the availability of large amounts of waste heat in the production of most chemicals, about 80% of process heat below 200 °C (equivalent to about 25% of all process heat) can be supplied by high temperature heat pumps. One example from a chemical plant in the United Kingdom employs a 12 MW heat pump to recycle excess steam at 152 °C and raises the temperature to 211 °C, reaching a coefficient of performance (COP) of 5.3 (530% efficiency).
The chemical sector is also increasingly important to the decarbonisation of other sectors, such as shipping, and potentially also iron and steel. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Iron Research, Germany, recently successfully proved at a laboratory scale that green steel can be produced with ammonia.3
Innovative plastics recycling techniques can provide benefits including reducing the need for virgin production, reducing downcycling (in which a material is recycled into a lower-value end use) and reducing plastic waste. Yet only 8% of plastic production uses secondary plastic today. Many different methods are being developed to recycle plastics. Mechanical recycling is often preferable due to its lower energy consumption releative to chemical recycling, but its deployment is limited by the purity of the available plastic waste. Pyrolysis is one of the leading technologies being explored today to deal with the increasing complexity of plastic waste streams. Other options include gasification and solvent dissolution, such as PureCycle’s process for propylene plastic recycling. In April 2022 Aptar and PureCycle achieved a testing milestone, when Aptar used prototype material from the PureCycle process with performance similar to conventional resin.
3 Note that non-traditional uses of ammonia and methanol, such as advanced fuels, are not included in the chemical sector activity, emissions and energy values on this page – they are rather in the fuel supply sector in IEA’s accounting framework.
For more information
Infrastructure supporting the decarbonisation of the chemical sector is expanding and diversifying but deployment must be accelerated
Infrastructure supporting the decarbonisation of the chemical sector is expanding and diversifying but deployment must be accelerated
Carbon capture needs for ammonia, methanol, and high-value chemicals in the Net Zero Scenario, 2010-2030
OpenIn the NZE Scenario, the chemical sector accounts for around 5% of the total expected CO2 emissions to be captured by 2030 (outside of the CO2 used to produce urea) and 11% of low-emission hydrogen consumption. While related low-carbon technologies are being deployed at an increasingly rapid rate, development of the necessary infrastructure to support them is lagging behind. Based on projects currently under development, dedicated CO2 storage capacity could reach around 110 Mt CO2/year by 2030, which is far less than the nearly 1 100 Mt CO2/year that is captured and stored by 2030 in the NZE Scenario. In the other hand, hydrogen infrastructure is also crucial for the decarbonisation of the chemical sector. Staying on track with the NZE Scenario would require around 15 000 km of hydrogen pipelines (including new and repurposed pipes) by 2030.
Policy ambition is increasing, especially on reducing plastic waste, but more action will be needed to get on track with the NZE Scenario
Policy ambition is increasing, especially on reducing plastic waste, but more action will be needed to get on track with the NZE Scenario
Many governments have introduced policies addressing industrial emissions specifically – these are discussed further on the IEA’s tracking page for industry. Several major policies and commitments have also been made to specifically address pollution stemming from chemical sector products:
- Many countries have been taking action to curb plastic pollution, with over 60 countries introducing bans and levies on plastic packaging and single-use items. Recent developments include a ban on many single-use plastic items in India from 2022, and a ban on several new items announced in Canada, also implemented in 2022.
- In 2021, France laid out a roadmap for the decarbonisation of its chemical industry, including a new target of 31% lower emissions by 2030, and concrete steps for lowering emissions across the sector. The United Kingdom and Germany laid out similar roadmaps in 2015 and 2019 respectively.
- Many countries are devoting considerable funds to improve plastic recycling technology and ensure that it is widely deployed, including Austria, Denmark, Finland, Japan and Sweden.
- The European Union launched the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability in 2020, as part of its European Green Deal. The strategy includes initiatives to protect against the hazards of chemical pollution, and to promote the decarbonisation of the industry.
View all chemicals policies
International collaboration has yielded a landmark agreement targeting plastic waste, but work remains to be done in other areas
International collaboration has yielded a landmark agreement targeting plastic waste, but work remains to be done in other areas
Many encouraging international developments relating to chemicals have recently been announced, including the following:
- In March 2022 the UN adopted a historic resolution to end plastic pollution, committing to create a legally binding international agreement by 2024.
- In 2022, Japan announced two joint agreements – one with Australia and the other with Indonesia – committing to jointly support initiatives to accelerate the development and commercialisation of low- and zero-emission technologies, towards the transition to net zero emissions. These technologies include clean fuel ammonia, low-emission hydrogen and derivatives produced from renewable energy.
Major chemical producers are taking proactive action towards decarbonisation
Major chemical producers are taking proactive action towards decarbonisation
Many private-sector and non-governmental actors in the chemical industry are beginning to take important actions towards decarbonisation. The First Movers Coalition, which works across a number of emissions-intensive sectors, is developing an initiative on reducing chemical sector emissions, due to be launched at the Clean Energy Ministerial 2023, India, in July. Furthermore, global chemical companies, in collaboration with the World Economic Forum, are creating the Low-Carbon Emitting Technologies Initiative, an organisation devoted to decarbonising the chemical industry through the proliferation of clean technology, due to start by the end of 2023. Leading global chemical companies have also begun to set objectives under the “Science-based targets” initiative for the sector.
Recommendations
-
As with industry overall, decarbonisation of the chemical industry will require multiple measures, including:
- Adopting mandatory CO2 policies covering industry and expanding international co-operation – domestically this might include carbon prices, while carbon border adjustments or international sectoral agreements might be considered to limit carbon leakage.
- Investing in and planning for supporting infrastructure, including for CO2 transport and storage and low-emission hydrogen production and distribution.
- Improving data collection, tracking and classification systems, in which industry participation and government co‑ordination are both important.
- Increasing investment in RD&D and deployment for low-carbon technologies, for example through finance mechanisms that mobilise private investment. This is essential for eliminating some emissions, including through investment in hydrogen and methods of reducing plastic waste.
- Creating a market for near zero-emission industrial products – initially through carbon contracts for difference or direct public procurement. For chemicals, this might include companies using alternatives to fossil fuels as feedstocks.
- Maximising energy productivity by accelerating progress in energy efficiency, recycling and material efficiency. Deploying best available technologies and material efficiency strategies can facilitate this, and policy makers can incentivise these actions.
- Managing existing assets and near-term investment in order to create a smooth energy transition (e.g. mandating refurbishment to near zero-emission technology to avoid stranded assets).
-
Energy costs make up a substantial proportion of the overall costs faced by chemical producers. Policies subsidising certain fossil fuel uses distort the market, leading to inefficient energy use and inhibiting shifts towards feedstocks that are less carbon-intensive or renewable. Eliminating these policies can help lead to more energy-efficient and less emissions-intensive chemical production.
-
Increasing plastic recycling rates will be essential to lowering emissions from the chemical sector, as it will reduce the need for fossil fuel for new plastic production. Furthermore, increased recycling can avoid the air and water pollution that commonly results from disposal methods such as landfilling and incineration. Additionally, reducing overall plastic consumption wherever possible, particularly single-use plastics for which easy alternatives exist, will help reduce emissions.
Actions can be taken all along the supply chain to reduce plastic waste and increase recycling. Institutional frameworks defining stakeholder responsibilities should be created to ensure cost-effective and concerted action. Single-use plastic bans should be implemented where they do not already exist, and strengthened where they do. Awareness of the importance of plastic recycling should also be raised among consumers. For producers, design codes and practices can be implemented to simplify extraction and sorting of materials, reducing the need for disposal and new production. Extended producer responsibility policies are a further option, making producers accountable for collecting, sorting and processing products after use. Policies that put a price on recyclable waste going to landfill have also proven to be effective.
Continued innovation in plastics recycling methods to enable the recycling of a broader range of plastics and prevent downcycling will also be important.
Programmes and partnerships
Lead authors
Diana Perez Sanchez
Contributors
Leonardo Collina
Fabian Voswinkel